Session reviews

These are reviews written by voluntary delegates that will help you get a glimpse of the buzz around the 6th World Conference of Science Writers. Click on any title to read the full review. Then leave your comment: do you agree with this review? Did you hear a different message? We'd love you to discuss it with you!

2009-10-06 08:59

Chairman Philipe Pajot, science journalist from French Association of Science Journalists

Outlined the topics of this session, which were the similarities and differences in which genetics is reported mainly in French speaking newspapers, and then introduced the speakers. 

Francois Heindryckx, who had written many books on media in Europe, explained that he usually attends conferences where the peers are to present his research. Researcher in general has to defend himself because colleagues attack him and his methods or the things that he forgotten or the theoretic framework he got wrong. This is different now – he is talking to journalists about study made about journalists. This study was made in collaboration with the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, where colleagues were given grant from Genome BC to find out how journalists cover genetic research and genomics. Schools in Quebec and Lille in France also investigated and research was transposed to Belgium as well.

The study turns to be threefold:

   1. Content analysis how the research is reported on four markets
   2. Interviews with science journalists in general
   3. Interviews with scientists themselves (now in process)

2009-10-06 08:54

Tim Radford, chairman, greeted the audience and introduced himself and the speakers.

At the outset he stressed that in Britain everything is written according to the audience – they dictate their expectations. 

Nadia El-Awady, Program Manager & Founder, WFSJ & Arab Science Journalists Association, Egypt

She outlined specific case – how the media in Egypt covered the swine flu (May, 2009). This case revealed weaknesses of the Egyptian media. Egypt has a special background which creates a certain state of mind and leads to chaos. It can be illustrated by following steps:

23, April – WHO began reporting cases of N1H1.

28, April – Egyptian parliament called for slaughter of the pigs.

29, April – Slaughter started by presidential decree.

Background:

   1. Egypt is the only Islamic country that has a significant pig population: 100 000 – 300 000 heads. Consumption of pork is prohibited by Islam but there is a large tourism industry and 10 % of population is Christian. Majority of the pigs belong to the Christian minority.
   2. Egyptian government received much criticism in the past few years – there was huge rockslide which killed 100 people, fires which burned parliamentary house, ferry sinking which killed hundreds of people. This created a lot of mistrust to the government.
   3. Plans to remove pigs were here since 2006 already because pigs are not bred on farms but live with people in their homes in slums. People who have the pigs are garbage collectors who bring the garbage to pigs to eat. This creates sanitary problems. The plans though were never carried out.
   4. There exists tension between the Christians and the Muslims in the past few years.
   5. There are concerns over corruption in every section of the society.
   6. As a result Egyptian government involved itself into the drastic response to the imminent threat – they felt the pig flu virus would mutate in the pig and become dangerous.

2009-07-14 04:39

Kaianders Sempler, editor of Ny Teknik, in his famous flower straw hat almost acted his introductory piece. He began from the Greek Euripides, who in his play brought first discussion tyranny vs. democracy, advantages and disadvantages of each. Discussion served as a system of solving problems by considering all possibilities without having to go to war. Politicians in democracy give promises which they forget once they are elected. Tyrants can concentrate on huge goals – but these can serve their own agenda.

2009-07-13 08:24

At the beginning a showreel was played introducing stories by Jonica Newby, science writer from Australia. These stories covered various fields of science: Medieval Islamic Scientist, Cosmologists, Time and Science, Urban Myth, Story of Oil, Chemistry of Mud, and How the Body Wakes Up. Jonica stressed that although it seems that science TV is thriving, TV-stations during this crisis are more or less closing their science divisions and budget cuts appeared in the beginning of this year. As a consequence filming is not carried out in studios, it has to be done in the natural environment.

2009-07-13 08:07

In this session, three science journalists talked about moments in their careers in which they chose to take a non-objective position in the name of science.

2009-07-13 06:43

Reporting on creationism was one of the hottest debates during the WCSJ in London. Science journalists from all around the world listened to the views of James Randerson, environment website editor at the Guardian newspaper and Michael Reiss, academic of science education and a priest in the Church of England. 

The main question of the session “Balance not needed? Science journalism and the reporting of creationism” was if it was true that science journalists give more space or weight to the scientific view when reporting about creationism. 

2009-07-13 06:21

Christina Scott from SciDev.net, South Africa, and Chris Smith from the Naked Scientists gave their closing address with a tongue in cheek retrospective video of some of the conference’s choice moments and interviews, whilst the community showed its gratitude to the key organizers by presenting flowers to Julie Clayton, UK science journalist, Sallie Robins, UK science publicist, Sarah Willan from Benchmark Communications, UK and Fiona Fox from the Science Media Centre, UK.

2009-07-13 06:19

WCSJ 2009 wound up with a final plenary discussion led by Pallab Ghosh, BBC science correspondent and president of the World Federation of Science Journalists, and three prominent figures in science policy development. John Beddington, Chief Scientific Advisor (CSA) to the UK government, Patrick Cunningham, CSA to the Irish government and Tidu Maini, Executive Chairman of Qatar Science & Technology Park, who each gave an overview of their roles in science policy and advice to government in their respective countries.

2009-07-13 06:16

The financial downturn may have knocked health off the top spot of the news agenda, but cancer is still considered the number one health concern by the British public. In the minds of the general reader, cancer remains a killer at large and science is far from finding a cure. Fear drives the relentless coverage which bounces between cures, failures, hope and despair.

2009-07-13 02:15

Do we need to be reminded that genetics has undergone an amazing revolution for the last decade? Since the first human genomes were decoded in 2002 - after 10 years of research and a staggering bill of more than 1 billion dollars - the sequecing technology, which allows for a full genome to unfold, has followed Moore’s law: becoming faster and cheaper by a factor of 10 each year. 

Website design and conference organisation by Benchmark

Photographs copyright:

  • 5th World Conference of Science Journalists, Melbourne Australia
  • ScienceinPublic
  • Visit London
  • World Federation of Science Journalists

WCSJ 2009
Benchmark Communications
14 Blandford Square
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4HZ

Email: info@wcsj2009.org
Tel: +44 (0)191 241 4523