- Home
- My Stuff
- News
- People
- Programme
- Places
- Community
- Contact
- Conference Handbook
- Blogs
- Forums
- Galleries
- Images from Sunday June 28
- Images from Monday June 29
- Editors talk about science
- Embargoes in Science
- Gala Reception
- General photos
- Monday's Workshop
- Plenary Science Policy
- Reporting Climate Change
- Science Centres
- Science, High Brow?
- Sunday night meeting
- WCSJ 09 July 2
- WFSJ General Assembly
- Welcoming Reception
- Media Reception
- Jobs offered
- Reference documents
- Weblinks
09. Does science need to be highbrow?
Submitted by Horacio Salazar on Sun, 2009-05-31 10:28
Strand:
Development Strand Host or sponsor:
Session supported by: Knight Science Journalism Fellowships
Readers' and viewers' appetite for science has increased hugely in the last decade and news editors of popular titles and high viewing TV stations have responded by placing the subject high on the news agenda. How has science reporting in these mediums changed science journalism, and how can science be best communicated to mass audiences? Can science be simplified to a level that all educational levels can understand and if so how? If sub-editors misunderstand the science, how can writers ensure accuracy? What is the impact of new media of helping communication of science to these audiences?
Session reviews:
2009-07-04 11:39
